llmcost.xyzVast.ai vs SaladCloud: Cheap GPU Pricing Compared

Vast.ai vs SaladCloud: Cheap GPU Pricing Compared

Compare low-cost RTX 4090-class GPU pricing, billing, and reliability trade-offs between a decentralized marketplace and a distributed consumer GPU network.

📅 Data verified: 2026-06-17

Vast.ai and SaladCloud both target cost-conscious GPU renters, but they do it with very different supply models. Vast.ai is a decentralized marketplace with per-minute billing and prices starting around $1.87/hr for H100 PCIe, $0.67/hr for A100 80GB, and $0.20/hr for RTX 4090, while SaladCloud is a distributed network of 60,000+ gaming PCs with per-hour billing and RTX 4090 pricing from $0.20/hr.

FeatureVast.aiSaladCloud
Pricing ModelDecentralized GPU marketplace (bid-based)Distributed consumer-GPU network (60,000+ gaming PCs)
BillingPer-minutePer-hour
H100 Pricingfrom ~$1.87/hr (PCIe)
A100 80GB Pricingfrom ~$0.67/hr
RTX 4090 Pricingfrom ~$0.20/hrfrom $0.20/hr
Founded20182021

💡 Pricing reflects publicly listed on-demand rates as of 2026-06-17 and may vary by region, GPU availability, or change over time. Always confirm current pricing on the provider's site before committing.

Why Choose Each Provider

Vast.ai

  • Often the cheapest marketplace prices for any given GPU
  • Huge GPU variety from thousands of independent hosts
  • Interruptible/spot instances for extra savings
  • Reliability and network speed vary by host
  • No enterprise SLA or guaranteed uptime
  • Prices fluctuate live with marketplace supply/demand

SaladCloud

  • Cheapest GPU compute available for consumer-grade cards
  • Good for batch/inference workloads tolerant of interruptions
  • Massive distributed network of RTX 3090/4090-class GPUs
  • Consumer-grade hardware — node failures and latency variance
  • No H100/A100 — not suited for large model training

Verdict

For short-lived experiments, bursty inference, or solo researchers chasing the lowest possible price across many GPU types, Vast.ai is the better pick because it offers per-minute billing, interruptible instances, and entry pricing as low as ~$0.67/hr for A100 80GB and ~$1.87/hr for H100 PCIe. For batch inference or consumer-GPU workloads that can tolerate interruptions and don't need datacenter accelerators, SaladCloud is the better pick because it offers RTX 4090 capacity from $0.20/hr across a 60,000+ node gaming-PC network. If you specifically need H100 or A100 access, Vast.ai is the practical choice since SaladCloud does not offer H100 or A100 instances.

FAQ

Is Vast.ai cheaper than SaladCloud for H100s or A100s?

Yes by default, because Vast.ai actually offers those datacenter GPUs while SaladCloud does not list H100 or A100 80GB at all. On Vast.ai, H100 PCIe starts from about $1.87/hr and A100 80GB starts from about $0.67/hr, so if your workload requires either class of GPU, Vast.ai is the only option of the two.

Which is better for cheap RTX 4090 inference: Vast.ai or SaladCloud?

They are similar on headline starting price, since both list RTX 4090 from $0.20/hr. Vast.ai is usually better if you want more marketplace flexibility and per-minute billing, while SaladCloud is attractive if your inference or batch jobs can run on a large distributed pool of 60,000+ consumer PCs and tolerate node variability.

Does SaladCloud support spot or interruptible instances like Vast.ai?

Vast.ai explicitly offers interruptible/spot instances for extra savings as part of its bid-based marketplace, and it bills per minute. SaladCloud's network is inherently interruption-prone because it runs on consumer gaming PCs, but the provided data does not list a separate spot-instance model; it bills per hour and is best suited to workloads already tolerant of failures and latency variance.